Leveraging Modules in Geb

Geb Page and Module classes are just regular Groovy classes. In addition to the contentDSL you can declare methods just as you would in any other class. Those methods can use content properties directly.

Page object methods tend to fall into two categories:


  • report on some aspect of page state (e.g. whether a user is logged in or not).
  • have non-void return types (I prefer explicit return types on methods but def would work too).
  • can be used for making assertions.


  • perform an action such as clicking a link or button.
  • will typically be void (note that it’s not necessary to return a Page instance or class from a navigation method in Geb).
  • throw IllegalStateException if the action is invalid in the current page state.

First let’s consider an authentication module that can be used across every page in a site. The markup of the module can be completely different depending on whether a user is logged in or not. When not logged in a username/password form is shown:

<aside id="auth"> 
        <legend>Log In</legend> 
        <form action="/auth/login" method="post" > 
            <label>Username: <input name="username"/></label> 
            <label>Password: <input type="password" name="password"></label> 
            <button name="login" type="submit">Log In</button> 

When logged in, a welcome message is shown:

<aside id="auth"> 
    Welcome back <span class="username">thomas</span> 
    <a href="/auth/logout" name="logout">Log Out</a> 

To model this I’ll create a Geb Module like this:

class AuthModule extends Module {
    static base = { $("aside#auth") }

    static content = {
        username(required: false) { $(".username").text() }
        logoutButton(required: false, to: HomePage) { $("a[name=logout]") }
        form(required: false) { $("form") }
        loginButton(required: false, to: HomePage) { $("button[name=login]") }

The required: false declaration is used to declare content properties that may or may not be on the page. The username and logoutButton properties are only present in the logged-in state and the form and loginButton properties are only present in the logged-out state.

I can use the module in some tests like this:

def "user can log in"() {
    authModule.form.username = "thomas"
    authModule.form.password = "Password@1"

    at HomePage
    authModule.username == "thomas"

def "user can log out"() {

    at HomePage
    authModule.username == null

This is a good start but there are several assumptions and bits of page detail creeping into the test. The test is using the presence or absence of the username to determine if someone is logged in or not. That doesn’t lead to a very meaningful assertion in the test and is assuming things about the page detail. Likewise the login step is quite long-winded and likely to be repeated in a lot of tests. Not only that but it won’t work if a user is already logged in as the form fields won’t be present on the page.

To encapsulate the module’s state and actions better I’ll add the following methods:

boolean isLoggedIn() { username }

void login(String username, String password = "password") {
    if (loggedIn) throw new IllegalStateException("already logged in")
    form.username = username
    form.password = password

void logout() {
    if (!loggedIn) throw new IllegalStateException("already logged out")

The methods declared by the module abstract some detail away very effectively. The isLoggedIn method means I can change the login detection mechanism later and just change the module’s method rather than a bunch of tests. The login and logout methods abstract away the how of logging in and out so the test can just deal with the what. I’ve used IllegalStateException for cases where a method is called when the module is not in the correct state. The tests now look much clearer:

def "user can log in"() {
    authModule.login "thomas"

    at HomePage
    authModule.username == "thomas"

def "user can log out"() {

    at HomePage

Another good example of encapsulating state and behaviour like this is a typical pagination module that would appear on a list or search results page. The markup would look something like this (I’ve omitted the link href attributes for clarity):

<nav class="pagination">
    <a class="prevLink">Previous</a>
    <a class="step">1</a>
    <span class="currentStep">2</span>
    <a class="step">3</a>
    <a class="nextLink">Next</a>

The previous and next links will only appear when there is a previous or next page and no links will be present at all if there is only a single page. The following Module class models the state and actions of this component:

class Pagination extends Module {
    static content = {
        links(required: false) { $("a") }
        currentPage(required: false) { $(".currentStep")?.text()?.toInteger() ?: 1 }
        nextLink(required: false) { links.filter(".nextLink") }
        previousLink(required: false) { links.filter(".prevLink") }

    boolean isFirstPage() {

    boolean isLastPage() {

    void toPage(int pageNumber) {
        def link = links.filter(text: "$pageNumber")
        if (!link) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Page number $pageNumber not present in pagination")

    void nextPage() {
        if (lastPage) throw new IllegalStateException("Already on the last page")

    void previousPage() {
        if (firstPage) throw new IllegalStateException("Already on the first page")

Breaking the Module down in detail:

  • The currentPage property returns the current page number as an int and defaults to 1 if there is no pagination present in the page.
  • The isFirstPage and isLastPage observer methods use the absence of the previous and next links respectively to determine if the current page is the first or last one.
  • The toPage method finds a numbered link and clicks it, throwing IllegalArgumentException if no such link is present.
  • The nextPage and previousPage action methods throw IllegalStateException if the relevant link is not on the page.

The Pagination class now neatly encapsulates the detail of the pagination elements and presents a higher-level façade to the tests.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s